Forever 59

This weekend, in the rural Victorian (AUS) town of Wonthaggi, athletes will be suiting up, warming up, and putting their best efforts out there in Round 1 of the Australian MX National Championships.  In most years this would just be another season start. However, this event is made more significant because it was at this same round just over twelve months ago that a 20-year-old Queensland-based MX rider paid the ultimate price.

It will be a challenging weekend for all who are connected to the memory of Bradyen’s fatal crash so recently.

Brayden Erbacher’s passing was a tragedy. These tragedies are not restricted to any one sport or individual.  The last fatal accident during competition in The Pro motocross championship was the loss of Andrew McFarlane who passed away after crashing at Broadford on May 2nd, 2010.[1]

All elite-level athletes to varying degrees relate to and share the risk-reward challenge of sport, and have immediate empathy for athletes such as Brayden, their family and friends. But what about the sport? Does the sport care enough to honour the legacy of the athlete in moments such as this?

This article reflects on the way motocross (MX) globally has shown they care, and that Brayden will not be forgotten.  And in sharing this one-year report card on the sport of MX, I trust that it adds to the legacy of the racer.

Many organizations and individuals within the motocross community since that fateful moment on March 7, 2023, have acted in a way that deserves to be recognized.  These include the following.

  • Brayden’s family
  • Motorcycling Australia
  • Rohan Jenkins
  • Hunter Lawrence
  • Sunshine State MX Series
  • The Kilcoy Motorcycle Club
  • The Manjimup Motor Cycle Club
  • Johnny Hopper
  • FIST
  • Thrilla
  • Brayden

NB. If anyone has been overlooked, I apologize – send me anything I have missed and I will update the article.:

Brayden’s family

Brayden Erbacher’s  family bore the grief of losing Brayden Despite this the family had the courage to make statements very soon after:

The below statement was issued through Motorcycling Australia:

“The Erbacher Family would like to thank everyone at Racesafe including the paramedics, first responders and the riders and families that supported us.

“We are beyond proud to call Brayden our son and will be forever grateful for having him in our lives. He is our hero and will be greatly missed.”[2]

The following statement was issued through Channel Nine:

His mother Corinne, issued a statement to Nine News on behalf of the family which paid a loving tribute.

“We are shattered beyond words,” she told Nine News. “On behalf of the family, we would like to thank the whole motocross community for their support today while our whole world fell apart. “Brayden touched the lives of so many, and we were so proud to call him our son.[3]

You will see the family at the MX track every race, impeccably presented in clothing supporting Brayden’s legacy.

Motorcycling Australia

Motorcycling Australia, the official body of the sport in Australia, cancelled the event immediately after Brayden’s crash (keeping in mind the incident occurred in the first lap of the first moto in the MX2 Class), and issued the following statement the next day:

Official Statement on Brayen Erbacher

Motorcycling Australia, our ProMX Management Team and the wider motorcycling family are today united in grief at the passing of ProMX MX2 rider #59 Brayden Erbacher, who passed away as a result of injuries sustained in race one of Round One of the 2023 ProMX Championship.

Season 2023 was to be Brayden’s second year in the MX2 Championship, the pinnacle series for 250cc Four Stroke machines. Although a late starter in racing compared to some, Brayden had come to Wonthaggi from Queensland with his family and his Roo Systems Diesel Tuning Race Team to take on Australia’s best. His first ProMX campaign in 2022 had seen illness prevent him from competing for the full season, but a vigorous and productive off-season on the push bike, in the pool and in the gym had seen him return to full fitness and he noted “head is down, bum is up, plenty of work to be done…!” in anticipation of a full ProMX season in 2023.

Away from racing, Brayden was a likeable, handsome, and creative young man. He enjoyed his fishing, camping, and playing the guitar. In his own words, he liked “to keep things fun but I’m also a determined person and like a challenge.” In line with his cheeky nature, he said his career highlight to date was “beating Dan Reardon in a 125 race” and listed his hero growing up as US champion motocross racer Ryan Villopoto.

He also noted he was responsible for “making the #59 more famous than Dad ever did…”

While the ProMX Championship is the peak of Australian competition motocross, and our racing is close and often fiercely competitive, we are still a very close-knit community where friendships and camaraderie cross all bike brands, events and sponsors. Brayden’s passing has affected us all deeply.

Today we share the grief and sadness of Brayden’s family and reflect on a good life that was well-lived but tragically cut short. Our thoughts remain with his family and friends, but also with our own wider motocross and motorcycling family, our officials, volunteers, staff, partners, sponsors and of course the fans of this brilliant but occasionally cruel sport.

Motorcycling Australia will continue to co-operate with the relevant authorities as the investigation into the circumstances surrounding this incident continue. We have offered unconditional cooperation and assistance in these matters.

Motorcycling Australia is assisting the Erbacher Family and Brayden’s team at this difficult time.

Rohan Jenkins

Rohan Jenkins set up a GoFundMe account within a week after the crash to support the family, which far exceeded the initial target set.[4]

The organiser of the fundraiser, Rohan Jenkins, wrote that ‘Brayden touched the lives of many, but none more so than his loving family. This fund is set up for friends, family, work colleagues and the wider community to support Ash, Corinne, Damon and Ellie during this difficult time,’ he wrote. [5]

<div class=”gfm-embed” data-url=”https://www.gofundme.com/f/brayden-erbacher/widget/large?sharesheet=CAMPAIGN_PAGE”></div><script defer src=”https://www.gofundme.com/static/js/embed.js”></script>

Hunter Lawrence

Hunter is one of two brothers who may well become the greatest MX exports out of Australia. Hunter was 23 years old at the time of Erbacher’s passing, and from rthe same country. The weekend after Erbacher’s passing Hunter dedicated his 250SX East victory in Indianapolis to Brayden:

“We work so hard for these days and I want to dedicate this to a young Australian rider who lost their life recently, Brayden Erbacher – this one is for you buddy,” red plate-holder Lawrence said from the podium on Saturday evening. “I know you are over there keeping me safe on such a gnarly track.

“I didn’t personally know Brayden, but I can only imagine what his friends, family and the motocross industry back home are going through, so this one is for you and for all of your friends and family buddy – you were riding with me out there and kept me safe on a gnarly track. This one is for him.[6]

Sunshine State MX Series

The Sunshine State MX Series, a series many pro riders use to prepare for the National Series, created a lap of honour for Brayden shortly after his crash, captured in this video.

The Kilcoy Motorcycle Club

The Kilcoy Motorcycle Club honoured Brayden’s memory later in 2023 with the naming of a ‘Memorial Club Championship Trophy’:

The Kilcoy Motocross Club has honoured the memory of club member Brayden Erbacher in its end of year presentation on Saturday, dedicating the Brayden Erbacher Memorial Club Championship Trophy.
Brayden’s family Corrine, Damon, Ellie and Brayden’s partner Emily, were there to present the Trophy which was won by 16-year-old Jet Doyle-Andrews. Jet was the club’s Mini Lites Big Wheel A grade overall champion and junior lites A grade overall champion, and was honoured to receive the award which carries the name of his friend. Brayden’s Mum Corrine thanked the motocross community for their love and support and for keeping Brayden’s memory alive
.[7]

The Manjimup Motor Cycle Club

A MX club in the regional area of Manjimup, the Manjimup Motor Cycle Club, located 307km south of Perth in Western Australian, issued a statement post Brayden’s passing askin[8]g “…all competitors and attendees at the first round of the 2023 South West Championship Series to wear black armbands in Brayden’s memory. “For a sport that can bring great happiness and elation, it also comes with times of great heartbreak and sorrow,” the club said.

Johnny Hopper

US social media commentator and off-road racer Johnny Hopper dedicated a show to the legacy of Brayden and US racer Ryder Colvin.

Moto Limited

Moto Limited, ‘a moto-centric group of podcasts dedicated to reviewing Motocross and Supercross in the US and Australia’, remastered a show in honor of Brayden.

“This special podcast is in honour of an amazing human. Brayden Erbacher was one of those people that don’t come around very often. A genuine person that was full of character, always down for a good time, and very respectful. He would give his shirt off his back for anyone regardless of who you were.

Brayden did 5 shows and was an amazing cohost when he was in the studio. He was part of a lot of firsts here at the Moto Limited Show and Show 23 has been remastered as he was the first co-host on the first live show.

My thoughts go out to Ash, Corrine, Damon, Ellie, and the rest of his close friends and Family. I can’t believe he’s gone but he will never be forgotten. Rest Easy Mate.”

FIST

Australian handwear company FIST have produced and sell a glove they call the BRAYDEN59 Glove Celebrating the life of Brayden Erbacher, with all proceeds going to the Erbacher Family.’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thrilla

Australian BMX, MTB, and MX shirts, pants, accessories, and riding gear company Thrila  have produced and sell a Brayden Tee titled ‘Honour Brayden’, where all proceeds go to the Erbacher Family)

.         

Brayden

It would be remiss to leave Braydon out of the acknowledgement. Brayden’s contribution to his legacy is a combination of the who he was, the connections and impressions he made with and on others, his achievements, and the artefacts he created e.g. Instagram.

This post from younger brother Damon Erbacher gives insight into Brayden’s contribution;

“You were the best big brother and I looked up to you every single day. You guided me through life to this point and for that I’ll always be grateful,” the younger Erbacher said on Instagram.

“I’ll forever be grateful for the time spent with you, you always were my No. 1 role model and the way you carried yourself through life is an inspiration to many … You’ll be missed dearly. You’ll always be my big bro.”[9]

Conclusion

Risk is inherent in sport. This risk involved in sports could be placed on a continuum, however it is a constant. What is perhaps not as constant are the responses of a sport as a community to those times when risk causes loss.  The aim of this article is to acknowledge the impressive way in which the Australian motocross community has responded to the death of one of its riders, both at the time and in the time since.

In my five decades of involvement in a wide range of sports at the highest level throughout the globe, I’ve had the opportunity to witness how sports and sports communities respond to tough times. I have been impressed with the way the sport of MX has supported the Erbacher family and honoured the legacy of Brayden through to the first anniversary of his passing.

Forever 59!

 

References

[1] https://www.fullnoise.com.au/fullnoise-news/queenslander-brayden-erbacher-dies-at-promx-opening-round/

[2] https://www.ma.org.au/official-statement-on-brayden-erbacher/

[3] https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/family-shattered-beyond-words-after-young-motocross-rider-dies-after-fall-20230305-p5cpla.html

[4] https://www.gofundme.com/f/brayden-erbacher

[5] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11856905/Motocross-rider-Brayden-Erbacher-GoFundMe-raises-thousands-mum-friends-pay-tribute.html

[6] https://www.motoonline.com.au/2023/03/13/lawrence-dedicates-indy-win-to-brayden-erbacher/

[7] https://www.mqld.org.au/kilcoy-club-honours-braydens-memory/

[8] https://www.triplem.com.au/story/shattered-beyond-words-tributes-flow-for-20-year-old-motocross-rider-killed-in-victorian-event-213769

[9] https://www.foxsports.com.au/motorsport/motocross-rider-brayden-erbacher-20-killed-in-national-championships-tragedy/news-story/0f3eff35cc188a53ba848d8390e2ed96

Thanks Tommy

In a quiet rural cemetery outside of Sulphur Springs, Arkansas, United States, lay the remains of Tommy ‘The Duke Morrison’.  Tommy is considered one of the most tragic stories in top-level US boxing. I believe his journey provides a great roadmap for all athletes especially those at the level where fame and fortune come knocking.

Tommy’s time as a world champion was fleeting. However, it may have been the loss of his right to participate in boxing that may been the thing that haunted him the most.

I just want to pursue my dream. That is to fight. That is what God put me here to do. He didn’t put me here to be a doctor or a lawyer. He put me here to fight.[22]

Tommy’s story deserves telling, both to respect his legacy as well as to serve the athletic world as a lesson on so many lessons.

As an athlete advocate, I feel sorry for Tommy, that the outcome of whatever guidance he did receive was not more successful.  At the same time Tommy is not alone as an athlete that failed one too many tests that life presents as an athlete rises the fame and fortune ladder.

His life lessons can serve many.

Tommy had a rough start to life

Tommy Morrison was born in Gravette, Arkansas on January 2, 1969.[1] His mother, Diana, was Native American (half Ponca and half Otoe) and his father Tim’s ancestry is diversely reported as Scottish[2] or Irish[3].  He was raised in was raised in Delaware County, Oklahoma, spending most of his teenage years in Jay.[4]

His early years were apparently tough.  In a later biography of Tommy, the author said:

Morrison…came from a broken home. He was a secondhand son, passed from here to there, from nowhere to nowhere bound, wherever he would stick. His father was abusive. His mother once beat a murder charge. His brother would spend fifteen years in prison for rape. And Tommy? His mother first made him use his fists when he was five years old.[5]

But having a rough start to life is not all negative. Tommy was a third-generation boxer[6], and the circumstances of his upbringing were conducive to creating a fighter:

Growing up predominantly consisted of alcohol and fighting for Tommy as a youngster. In his own words, Morrison said “There was often a lot of anger and violence growing up, I spent a lot of my time protecting people, mostly my Mother”.[7]

Tommy’s early sporting career

Tommy reportedly started boxing at the age of 10, and by the age of 13 was fighting adults on a fake ID. This suggests he was physically an early mature.

“When I saw him win a Toughman contest in the eighth grade, I knew something special was going on,” said Andy Hudson, his best friend. “Fourteen-year-olds just don’t beat the hell out of guys in their 20s and 30s. ” His mother was not surprised. Of all the boxers in the family, she always considered him to be the most natural.”[8]

However, he played other sports as well. He was offered a college football scholarship but turned that down to focus on his boxing career. [9]

Nearly an Olympian

After high school Tommy chose boxing over American football, and in his first year as a full-time fighter (July 6th 1988) Tommy contested the US Olympic trials, coming in second to Ray Mercer, who went on to knock out all four of his opponents in the 1988 Seoul Olympics and win the Gold Medal.[10]

The Morrison-Mercer fight at the US Olympic selections was won by a split decision and considered a tougher fight than any of the opponents at the Seoul Olympics.

That was perhaps the first major setback in Tommy’s career. You can appreciate that a win at the trials, followed by a possible Gold Medal at the 1988 Seoul Olympics, would have created a different path for Tommy. There is no guarantee the end would be any different, but that is a major path difference – between coming first and going to the Olympics and coming second and not going.

Tommy turns pro

Tommy turned pro in 1988 at 19 years of age, after a very brief but busy amateur career. His amateur record has been reported as 311 bouts, with 290 wins and 21 losses, with 263 wins by KO.[11]

His early pro record was so impressive that he was mentioned in the same sentence as Mike Tyson:

By the summer of 1989, he had amassed a record of 14-0. By now, Morrison had the nation’s fans and journalists questioning: who was this force of nature powering his way through the heavyweight division? The fight on everyone’s lips was Tyson vs Morrison[12]

The Great White Hope 

Tommy carried the burden of being referred to as another Great White Hope. This is a classic saying in US boxing when a big white man is plying his trade with potential in the heavyweight division.

Tommy was referred to endlessly as another ‘Great White Hope’.

I was impressed with how Tommy handled it, which I understand may be surprising to the reader as most of what Tommy did, I had questions about.

Tom told a Sports Illustrated journalist:

“It’s racist…Second, most White Hopes never make it.” [13]

He wanted to distance himself from this concept.

The author of a biography about Tommy was also impressed with Tommy’s stance:

It was inevitable that Morrison would come to be spoken of as a “Great White Hope.” To his credit, he did his best to avoid making race an issue. “It’s kind of sad,” he told the Kansas City Star. “To be honest, it’s a big advantage being white. There aren’t that many white fighters around. But I’d prefer to stay away from that because it’s racist.”[14]

What am I willing to sacrifice to be a World Champion?

In less than a year after turning pro, and at the age of about 20 years, Tommy was faced with what I believe was a career defining moment – do I pursue my goal of being a world champion professional boxer or do I take time away to be a movie star in a Hollywood blockbusting series called ‘Rocky’?

No, not all athletes get asked to detour through a brief Hollywood acting moment. However, all make similarly career-defining questions. The most common is – do I train for the best results in my chosen pursuit irrespective of what I look like, or do I allow my self to be distracted by shiny objects? Even as simple as train to look a certain way at the potential expense of my career?

Now I understand that not all athletes understand the implication of pursuing their visual appearance over performance, and I understand that sometimes it’s the coach overlaying the misguided value that an athlete needs to ‘look’ a certain way to be successful.

There’s more than one athlete who has asked me if they can do more beach muscles, to which I have replied – ‘Sure, when you are retired. Until then we will do the things that matter’.

However, as adults (over 18 years of age) the athlete has to accept the responsibility of their decisions.

Now to be clear Tommy did achieve World Heavyweight Champion status, twice. First in 1993, with the vacant WBO title, that he held for about 4 months and one title defence. The second was in 1986, the IBC belt for 4 months, which he lost the next fight.

Did Rocky V cost Tommy?

Let me ask you – would you have more likely known who Tommy Morrison was if he had been the dominant world champion, or for his role in Rocky V?

Tommy was in an era when success as a heavyweight male boxer was measured against their win-loss record with Mike Tyson. Tommy never got to fight Tyson.

Originally, in the early 1990s, I suggest that was in part because by the time Tommy was getting back into his rhythm post his distractions filming Rocky V, Mike Tyson was heading to prison.

That was strike one.

And by the time Mike got out of prison, Tommy was denied a second shot at Iron Mike for different reasons.

Loose 

By the time Mike Tyson was released from gaol in 1993, Tommy’s career was not necessarily on the up and up. Why? In part because outside of training he was loose. So loose is that the word was his coaching team would try to keep him busy in training because they were not successful in keeping him under control outside of training hours.

The reality was that the boy from Oklahoma was drinking, drugging, and carousing with many, many women. Caton concluded, “he was a womanizer beyond anything I’ve ever known.” [15]

Morrison was notorious for partying, womanizing, and general poor decisions. [16]

He lost his first of two brief World Heavyweight Title belts on his second fight after obtaining it, some say by being out on the drink the night before:

During the build to the fight with Bentt in October 1993, he didn’t take his training all too seriously and… he went to a concert the night before the fight, which is obviously something that fighters just don’t and shouldn’t do, and was drinking beer. Tommy Morrison’s night caught up with him the next day. Nobody was giving Michael Bentt much of a chance but Morrison simply wasn’t ready. ..

How much did that alone cost Tommy?

Tommy Morrison had lost his title and HBO Boxing commentator Jim Lampley was very quick to point out that his $8 million payday with Lennox Lewis was gone as well.[17] [the next fight booking against Lennox Lewis]

That was strike two.

HIV

But all was not lost. Boxing promoter Don King gave Tommy a lifeline to achieve the Tyson fight.

…promoter Don King wanted to give Morrison millions of dollars to fight Mike Tyson in 1996. King knew that the whole world would pay to see the Great White Hope take on the World’s Baddest Man.[18]

Then, in February 1996 – on the eve of the first of three fights under contract with promoter Don King that would have eventually meant a fight with Mike Tyson and $40 million – came the stunning revelation Morrison had tested positive for HIV, probably knocking him out of the ring for good.[19]

That was strike three.

Compared to Magic

Tommy had the opportunity to be the Magic Johnson of boxing. By that I mean they were top athletes in their chosen field when they were diagnosed as being HIV positive, which challenged their future in their respective sports. Even non-sporting people know who former NBA star Magic Johnson is for the way he handled his diagnosis.  He became an advocate for those with HIV. Most non-sporting people have no idea who Tommy Morrison is, in part because of the way he handled his diagnosis. A short time after his press conference announcing his HIV-positive result, Tommy denied he had HIV, and spent the rest of his life – to his death at 44 years of age – maintaining that position.

A difference to Magic was that boxing denied Tommy a license to fight. Magic made a few comebacks to the NBA and played in the 1992 Olympics post his HIV announcement. Things might have been better for Tommy had he too been able to ply his trade. Who knows.

Tommy was understandably affected by the reaction to his condition:

The day Morrison announced he was HIV positive, a sign just outside the Jay city limits that touted his accomplishments mysteriously fell down.[20]

I would walk into a room, and people would be like, ‘Hide the children. Here comes the guy with AIDS.’ That’s very demeaning, and it really hurts your spirit. ”[21]

That’s a tough road for anyone who loses not only their health but also their status. But Magic had been there already, and Tommy could have taken some cues from Magic’s playbook.

Conclusion

Many refer to Tommy’s boxing life and career as tragic. It’s difficult to disagree, however, I believe he also provided a role model – of career-defining decisions that no athlete should be modelling.

In a very lucid moment, in the press conference he announced his HIV-positive test, Tommy said:

To all my young fans out there, I ask that you no longer consider me a role model. See me as an individual who had the opportunity to be a role model but blew it. Blew it with irresponsible, irrational, immature decisions.”[22]

Sure you could have achieved more, but that sums up the career of most. I believe your life lessons should not be in vain.

Tommy, you were a great role model, and I thank you for that. RIP.

 

References

[1] https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=MO034

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Morrison#:~:text=His%20mother%2C%20Diana%2C%20was%20Native,from%20the%20clan%20Morrison%20ancestry.

[3] https://theneutralcornerboxingdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/the-duke-the-life-and-times-of-tommy-morrison/#:~:text=Morrison%20was%20also%20a%20talented,City%20to%20begin%20his%20career.n

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Morrison#:~:text=His%20mother%2C%20Diana%2C%20was%20Native,from%20the%20clan%20Morrison%20ancestry.

[5] https://tss.ib.tv/boxing/featured-boxing-articles-boxing-news-videos-rankings-and-results/72749-book-review-the-duke-the-life-and-lies-of-tommy-morrison

[6] https://theneutralcornerboxingdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/the-duke-the-life-and-times-of-tommy-morrison/#:~:text=Morrison%20was%20also%20a%20talented,City%20to%20begin%20his%20career.n

[7] https://theneutralcornerboxingdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/the-duke-the-life-and-times-of-tommy-morrison/#:~:text=Morrison%20was%20also%20a%20talented,City%20to%20begin%20his%20career.

[8] https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/1993/08/08/morrison-student-of-hard-knocks/62451759007/

[9] https://theneutralcornerboxingdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/the-duke-the-life-and-times-of-tommy-morrison/#:~:text=Morrison%20was%20also%20a%20talented,City%20to%20begin%20his%20career.

[10] https://olympics.com/en/athletes/raymond-a-mercer

[11] https://theneutralcornerboxingdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/the-duke-the-life-and-times-of-tommy-morrison/#:~:text=Morrison%20was%20also%20a%20talented,City%20to%20begin%20his%20career.

[12] https://theneutralcornerboxingdotcom.wordpress.com/2020/04/22/the-duke-the-life-and-times-of-tommy-morrison/#:~:text=Morrison%20was%20also%20a%20talented,City%20to%20begin%20his%20career

[13] http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1140300/2/index.htm

[14] https://tss.ib.tv/boxing/featured-boxing-articles-boxing-news-videos-rankings-and-results/72749-book-review-the-duke-the-life-and-lies-of-tommy-morrison

[15] https://commonreader.wustl.edu/c/duke-of-hazard/

[16] https://www.insidehook.com/culture/remembering-last-great-white-hope-tommy-morrison

[17] https://www.sportscasting.com/tommy-morrison-once-missed-out-on-an-8-million-payday-for-drinking-beer-at-a-concert/

[18] https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/feb/23/boxing.hiv

[19] https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/2000/07/30/down-for-the-count-prison-brings-home-cold-reality-for-ex-boxing-champ-morrison/62188292007/

[20] https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/2000/07/30/down-for-the-count-prison-brings-home-cold-reality-for-ex-boxing-champ-morrison/62188292007/

[21] https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/tommy-morrison-quotes

[22] https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/tommy-morrison-quotes

A lament for the late arrivals

In the modern history of athletic preparation, there has been growing consideration for physical preparation. What the Americans call ‘strength & conditioning’. It may not be accurate to suggest that physical preparation is a new concept. The interpretation of the stories of the Greek athlete Milo of Croton from 6th BC gives support to a longer history.

However physical preparation has changed a lot in the forty-plus years during my professional involvement in sport.

A review of literature review reveals that track and field and then American football led the way in embracing physical preparation during the last century, especially the American version of physical preparation where ‘strength training’ dominants, literally and figuratively (i.e. in the title – strength… and then conditioning).

As surprising as it seems to the younger generation these were the only sports up until about 1980 in the US and 1990 in Australia that fully embraced the American interpretation of physical preparation.

Post 1980 (North America) and 1990 (Asia Pacific) a new wave embraced the American interpretation of physical preparation. Power and mixed energy sports such as most field sports e.g. rugby union, rugby league, Australian Rules Football, to name a few Australian based sports.

I call this the second wave.

Post 2000 there was a third wave that involved sports such as swimming. Some may suggest that swimming embraced strength training earlier – not based on my experiences working with both US and Australian-based swimmers. Let’s just say the discussions in the national team environment, that I was party to, were not favorable in the direction of strength training for swimming. I did not see any real acceptance of this until post 2000, and I include observations of coaching protocols as well as the content being shared at the annual Australian Swim Coaches Association (as it was known then) conventions.

Post 2010 there was a fourth wave that involved sports with great balance and less direct relationship with swimming e.g. surfing, off-road motorcycle racing. I call these the late arrivals.

There is I suggest a pattern to the sequence of acceptance by sports of the American influenced ‘strength and conditioning’. From sports where strength training plays a bigger role through to sports where strength training plays a lessor role.

Table 1 – Four waves of sports that embraced physical preparation.

Phase USA Australia Sports
1 – Early embracers <1980 <1980 Track # field, American football
2 – >1980 >1990 Power and mixed energy sports e.g. rugby, Australian Rules
3 – >2000 >2000 Diverse medium sports e.g. swimming
4 – Late arrivals >2010 >2010 Displacement, balance and more coordination-based sports e.g. off-road motorcycle disciplines

©King, I., 2021

Put simply, there is a reason they are late arrivals. And therefore, blind acceptance and embracing of methodology applied in all other sports has even more potential downsides the further along the continuum you go.

I feel for the late arrivals, and I lament the collateral damage they are potentially walking into. To see they feel, they are being more ‘professional’ by the mere act of ‘going to the gym’ and embracing the same training values as their predecessors sports is hurtful to watch.

There is a reason certain sports were later to the ‘strength training’ party, and if you fail to respect that and fail to reflect and consider more optimal ways, then these sports will pay the biggest price of them all. And I suggest it is happening.

Firstly, if the lessons of the last century of strength training for sport were made available. However, they are not.

Let me give an example. There would be very few swimming coaches in the Australian high-performance environment alive and coaching today who were around in the 1960s when Australian swim coaches began their initial flirtation with strength training. They learned certain things and reacted appropriately, pulling back from this modality, in at least the way it was being done. I base these observations on personal discussions with the late John Carew. I doubt too many if any of the current Australian elite swim coaches have had such discussions. The lessons have been lost.

The outcome is increased injuries and decreased performance. The exact opposite to the proclaimed benefits of ‘strength and conditioning’. A great example of this is Australian rugby, where it’s been nearly 20 years since Australia beat the New Zealand All Blacks for the cherished Bledisloe Cup, and the nation has sunk to a historic low world ranking of 7th in recent years. There are reasons for this, and a big part of this I suggest is the misguided off-field training resulting in decreased performance potential and increased injury incidence and severity.

It’s tough to beat a nation where the players may be more culturally and genetically suited to the game when your off-field training is letting you down.

Secondly, it may also be fine if strength training for sport, the American way, has evolved well past the programs used for American football. However, I suggest they have not.

Again, in anticipation of challenges to my last statement, let me give you an example – a golf scholarship athlete at a Div. 1 US NCAA college given the exact program as the American football team at the same college – post 2010…

Many American football players do not run far, do not touch the ball and so. If you are not playing American football and conduct your off-field training in a way that is heavily influenced, you will pay a price. And I suggest that is happening.

However how many were around in the 1970s transition to the 1980s in physical preparation to know from a personal/ professional perspective what had transpired in the formation of the American interpretation of physical preparation. Not many. The lessons have been lost.

All athletes want to play, and some want to play at the higher levels. In this pursuit, they seek additional and ‘new’ ways to train, to gain confidence they are ‘on track’ e.g., training like ‘all the other pro’s’.

I feel for the late arrivals, and I lament the collateral damage they are potentially walking into. There should have been a better message for you by now, however there is not. Tread carefully.

Ideally, I should be saving I hope your non-specific (physical preparation) training helps you thrive. That would be nice. However, based on my experience and observations – what I know – if you do what the rest of your colleagues are doing in their interpretation of the best way to train, survive may be a more appropriate term.

You deserve better. Our profession has failed to deliver safe training, let alone optimal training. Now it’s up to you to be more discerning. Don’t assume. Don’t imitate. Seek answers, dig deeper, objectively question and interpret the cause-effect relationship of what you are seeing and doing. Be more scientific in your review than our profession is.

Your future depends on it.

And not just your sporting future.

Life’s not fair. Even at the Olympics.

Having the 2020 Games postponed by a year and not really being sure whether it was even going to happen was tough.

How hard was it to time a peak in the unknown?

There were the 12 Victorian (AUS) swimmers denied the opportunity to compete in the Olympic trials due to COVID regulations around travel. [1]

There is talk of a Canadian swimmer whose positive COVID-19 test precluding them from their Olympic Trials was shown to be a false positive the day later.

Then there were the three Olympic athletes ruled out of the Games before leaving home due to positive COVID tests.[2] And that was just the tip of the iceberg.

And the Ugandan athlete who test positive upon arrival in Japan and has been ruled out of the Games. [3] And that won’t be the last case we hear of.

And the athletes who have been ruled out after testing positive at the Games – and this is just  Day 1.[4]

Then there was the Canadian female basketball player who had to choose between being a breast feeding mum or an Olympian, as family members have been banned from the Tokyo Olympic Village.[5]

Then there was the US track athlete who had to choose between copping a drug ban for not opening the door to drug testing officials or sharing the abortion she had two days prior to the visit as the reason for not answering the door. The end result – no privacy and a drug ban.[6]

On the flip side there is the 80+% of Japanese who disapprove of the Games happening at all.[7]  One can only assume they feel the imposition of the Games is not fair.

Life’s not fair. Even at the Olympics.

References

[1] https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/olympics/swimming/tokyo-olympic-swimming-trials-australian-athletes-hopes-of-qualifying-crushed-by-covid19/news-story/436ca2c9da2be93cdef478ae4e40ea92

[2] https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1110516/chile-taekwondo-player-tests-positive

[3] https://swimswam.com/vaccinated-ugandan-olympic-athlete-denied-entry-to-japan-after-coronavirus-test/

[4] https://www.npr.org/2021/07/18/1017606827/two-athletes-have-tested-positive-for-covid-19-inside-the-olympic-village

[5] https://www.cbc.ca/sports/olympics/summer/basketball/olympics-canada-basketball-kim-gaucher-breastfeeding-1.6078717

[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/01/sports/olympics/abortion-doping-olympics-mcneal.html

[7] https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/05/17/national/tokyo-olympics-cancel-survey/

There is a better way – Part 5: There’s more to athlete preparation than ‘strength & conditioning’

Physical preparation in athlete preparation is over-rated.

Its obvious that few share my belief, considering the amount of focus and effort going into physical development globally. I learnt from my professional experience in North America in the late 1980’s and early 1990s that their culture placed a (potentially excessive) premium on physical development. That cultural value is now global, courtesy of the internet.

The model I ascribe to – and teach – for athlete development states there are four (4) components – technical (skill), tactical (tactics), psychological and physical. After based on my four decades of professional experience, I have concluded that (generally speaking) physical development is the least important of them all.

Only in junior sport will a physical advantage at the expense of the development of the other three athlete preparation qualities provide a superior, temporary sport performance advantage. And the athlete in their long-term success, which will be reduced for doing so, pays the price for this.

Now saying ‘physical development is over-rated’ is a tough thing for me to say, especially as doing just that – physical development – has put food on my table for the bulk of my adult life. However I came into this profession to help athletes be successful in sport, not to help them become physical successful per se.

Put simply athletes are spending too much time in the gym and not enough time in skill (technical) and tactical (tactics) development.

Now to make things worse…

The model I ascribe to (and teach) for physical development states there are four (4) components – flexibility, strength, speed and endurance. After based on my four decades of professional experience, I have concluded that (generally speaking) strength is NOT the most important of them all.

But you would not know that, because an increasing percent of physical training time globally in sport is being dedicated to strength development.

So how did we get to this point? In the 1960s strength training in sports was virtually non-existent. In the 1970s it began to raise its head in sport, especially in strength sports such as US college (American) football (gridiron).

One of the leading western world physical preparation professional bodies, the National Strength Coaches Association (NSCA), grew out of this growing movement – football strength coaches at US colleges.

A study of history shows the limits of this association. Strength training was missing, and that is what the NSCA provided. By the time they realized they have overlooked other physical qualities, all they could do was substitute the word ‘conditioning’ for the word ‘coach’, and have to change the acronym NSCA. To this day, their content is reflective of the origin – a heavy bias towards strength training with very little focus on the other physical qualities .

By the 1980s, whilst not as popular as fitness training in the broader society, strength training was being sought out by a growing number of sports (which I where I got my start in sport).

During the 1990s strength training gained acceptance globally – both in sport and the general population.

By now the void had been filled. Strength training was no longer deficient. However in true human ‘over-reaction’ style, we just kept going. In the post 2000 period too much emphasis is being placed on strength.

Now, to drill deeper, not only are we seeing an over-emphasis on strength training, the strength training being conduced is significantly flawed. More on this another day….

So what gave way to allow the extra time for strength training? Playing the sport (skill development), and flexibility training – which ironically (for myself and the values I teach) are THE MOST important athletic and physical qualities respectively….

I was introduced to stretching in high school sport. Half a century later, at the same school, I would be now exposed to less stretching.

Half a century ago I engaged in a sporadic self-driven participation in the strength training gym. It wasn’t organized, and few attended.

Now, at the same school, the strength program is compulsory for all athletes in all sports. If a student athlete does not attend the strength training program for that team, the young athlete is denied selection.

At high school half a century ago my spare time was used up playing kids-organized pick up games. Now, I would not have time to engage in this unstructured, skill-based training. I would instead be at the gym meeting and exceeding the new expectations that athleticism is more effectively developed in the weight room.

So I am not speaking hypothetically. I am speaking as I see it, including a very personal case study using the same high school half a century apart.

So we have potentially given up the two most important qualities of athletic and physical preparation for one quality that is not the most important….

How is that serving us athletically or health wise?

Is this situation likely to reverse? Not in the foreseeable future. Not whilst the trend is towards every high school in the western world having their own full-time ‘strength & conditioning’ coach. Not while the dominant belief is that all there is to athlete preparation is ‘strength & conditioning’.

Hopefully, one day….the world will realize again – that this is more to athlete preparation than ‘strength & conditioning’….

 

Note:

For those athletes and coaches who are concerned about the direction of training and want to believe there is a better way – congratulations. There is a better way. We have spend the last four decades discovering better ways to train, and we teach these better ways when we work with athletes or coaches. The KSI Coaching Program aims to provide you with the tools to train athletes and others in their highest and best interests, with no interest in what the dominant trend is or will be in the future. Learn more about KSI Coach Education here https://kingsports.net/courses/

There is a better way – Part 4:The simple things that can change the way athlete’s view themselves (and perform)

Little Johnny (or Julia) goes to mid-week training. The coach raises the ‘mistakes that cost them’ the last game. During training, the coach says:

‘Let’s go through the whole training session without dropping the ball. I don’t want to see any dropped ball!’

Little Johnny’s (or Julia’s) sub-conscious mind repeats the key words:

‘….dropped ball.’

Little Johnny’s (or Julia’s) body complies – the ball is dropped. More than once.

Little Johnny (or Julia) feels bad. One of their team-mates comes up and gives them a verbal ‘spray’:

‘Stop dropping the ball, you clumsy idiot!’

Little Johnny (or Julia) drops his/her head, feeling ashamed. Should a clumsy idiot like himself or herself even be out there, they wonder?

The coach hears this negative reinforcement and sees the exchange, but chooses to pretend they didn’t. After all, perhaps this will help them achieve their agenda?

The drill continues. More dropped ball. The coach tries screams and threats. No success – the ball is still being dropped.

So the coach introduces his ‘ace in the pack’ to solve the problem. Push-ups.

‘…you drop the ball during training, you do 10 pushups.’

Little Jonny (or Julia) drops the ball. The coach yells. Little Jonny (or Julia) does their push-ups.

The coach then raises the level of difficulty of the drill. Little Jonny (or Julia) feels there is no way they could do this! After all, they couldn’t do the simple version. They drop the ball again.

Frustrated by their ‘ace in the pack’ coaching strategy, the coach pulls out the ‘Joker in the pack’ strategy. Elimination. If you drop the ball, you are out of the drill. Little Jonny (or Julia) drops the ball soon after and is one of the first eliminated. They get the least time in technical rehearsal and the longest time on the sidelines reflecting on their failings.

At the end of training the coach says:

‘Its no wonder we lose games when we train like this!’

Little Johnny (or Julia) feels more of a loser now. Should they even bother with the next game?

It’s game day. Little Johnny (or Julia) is not feeling very confident. One of their team-mates comes up and gives them a verbal ‘spray’:

‘Stop dropping the f****** ball, you f****** useless idiot!’

[Yes, language like this occurs in teenage sports…at least in Australia…]

Little Johnny (or Julia) drop their head, feeling so small. Should a ‘f****** useless idiot’ like themself even be on the field?

The coach hears and sees this negative reinforcement – profanity included- but chooses to pretend they didn’t. After all, perhaps this will help them achieve their agenda?

[Yes, turning the blind eye by coaches to internal negative abuse is common in teenage sports, including, as I have seen, in ‘church schools’…]

Little Johnny (or Julia) drops the ball…again. The crowd groans in disappointment. The coach screams in anguish. The parents put it on the top of their ‘to be talked about list’ for after the game.

Little Johnny (or Julia) is feeling really bad about themself. They are looking for a rock to crawl under and hide.

In the team de-brief following the game the coach brings attention to it saying words to the effect ‘We’ve got to learn to hang onto that ball!’, and raves on for a few minutes about the mistakes that cost them the game. The coach concludes the huddle with:

‘Its no wonder we lose games when we play like this!’

Could Little Jonny (or Julia) is feel worse? Surely they will be safe in the refuge of family.

Little Johnny (or Julia) gets into the car for the drive home with the parents, and very quickly the conversation is brought to a discussion of the importance of catching the ball, of not letting the team down.

This is only making Little Johnny (or Julia) feel worse…

Little Johnny (or Julia) goes to mid-week training. The coach raises the ‘mistakes that cost them’ the last game. During training, the coach says:

…and the cycle is played over again….

Soon after Little Jonny (or Julia) wants to quit that sport.

Soon after that Little Jonny (or Julia) want to stop all sports.

Why would they want to play on? They only feel worse about themselves as a result of playing…..

Sound familiar? If you are not sure, ask a young athlete if they can relate to this story…

No, nothing above is embellished or fantasy. It’s real, and its happening just like this – and worse….(including the reference to ‘church schools’….)

In addition to social and physical rational for sports involvement there is the emotional and or psychological justifications. However these are only relevant if they are producing the key outcomes for the athlete.

So ask your self as a coach – by engaging in sports with me as the coach/with their coach, do the athletes:

  1. …Feel better about themselves? (Self-esteem)

  2. …Believe they are capable of even greater things? (Self-confidence)

Changing the way an athlete feels about himself or herself and achieving the purported benefits of sport relating to how an individual feels about themselves can be a simple looking out for and changing the way that athletes, coaches and parents speak to the athlete.

Note:

For those athletes and coaches who are concerned about the direction of training and want to believe there is a better way – congratulations. There is a better way. We have spend the last four decades discovering better ways to train, and we teach these better ways when we work with athletes or coaches. The KSI Coaching Program aims to provide you with the tools to train athletes and others in their highest and best interests, with no interest in what the dominant trend is or will be in the future. Learn more about KSI Coach Education here https://kingsports.net/courses/

 

If only they knew….

….what has been in print for over 20 years…

The sport specific technique session was coming to a close when I heard my fellow coach refer to a prior knee injury in one of the athlete.   Let’s call that athlete Billy.

Intrigued, at the conclusion of the session I asked the young athlete:

IK: What was the knee injury?

Billy: I had meniscus surgery on my left knee.

IK: Let me ask, were you doing off-field training at that time? Strength and conditioning?

Billy: Yes.

IK: Mmmm…And what age were you when this happened?

Billy: 15.

IK: Mmmm….

So I decided to provide some general guidance in the hope of helping to reduce the damage that was already done.

IK: So you need to keep away from strength training.

Now I know what you are thinking – Ian, does that mean you have changed your mind, that strength training is no longer important and relevant to sport. No, that’s not the case. But what I have got to realize from four decades of professional observation is that what most athletes are doing is damaging and most would be better off doing nothing. Especially those whose positions really don’t require high levels of size and strength, and especially those with prior joint injuries where (in my opinion) the injuries were caused or contributed to be the flawed off-field training).

Billy: Oh. I am doing a fair bit of strength training now.

IK: How much?

Billy: 4 days a week.

IK: Mmmm…Okay the next step would be to minimize your exposure to quad dominant exercises.

In the 1980s I saw first hand the phenomenon that physical therapists were calling ‘quad dominance’, and spend the next decade creating and refining a systems to categorize exercise, to help myself and any others who wanted to use the concept to avoid the damage caused by quad dominance. I called this concept ‘Lines of Movement’. [1]

So we’ve got many ‘professionals’ who can talk the talk – can word drop terms like ‘quad dominant’ and ‘posterior chain’ [2] – but have got no clue how, why or where it should be applied.

IK: You know, squats, lunges etc.

The look on Billy’s face told me all I needed to know.

IK: Okay, where did you get your program from.

The answer confirmed my fears.

IK: Let me see if I can help you. Show me the program and I will tell you the changes to make.

Billy showed me the program. Two days out of four were leg days. Nothing unusual there. And five out of the seven (5/7) exercises in each of those days were…..quad dominant exercises. The usual suspects – squats, lunges, step ups etc.

The boy was dead man walking. He had a challenged future in sport by virtue of what he was led to believe was ‘the right thing’ in his off-field training.

The only exception to this rule is those athletes with genetically gifted with load tolerant connective tissue.The kind that rise to the top in say US pro sport, from a base of millions. The eastern European philosophy – throw a lot of eggs at the wall, the ones that don’t crack – they will be the champions.

IK: Billy, there is possibly that for now you should do NO quad dominant exercise, at least for a few months.   The goal is to ideally reverse the imbalance the quad dominance you have created from years of imbalanced strength programs. Now you can move to a ratio of say 3:1 hip dominant to quad, etc. etc.7

Billy: What are some hip dominant exercises?

IK: Deadlifts, deadlift variations, Olympic lifts, Olympic lift variations etc etc. Single leg exercises where the trunk stays over (not that windmill bastardization of my single leg stiff legged deadlift though!

And then I left Billy to ponder the gap between what he had been led to believe was going to make him a better sports person, and those challenging thoughts provided by Coach King!

It’s always tough to walk away from an athlete left possibly to drown from incompetent advice. However I do my best to provide athlete and coach education. The challenge is the swell or rubbish education, at both professional, academic, and lay person level rises faster…..

Ah, the pro’s and con’s of the information age….

If only they athletes knew what damage they were doing to themselves in the way they trust those so-called experts and those in positions of authority.

——

[1] Now despite (or because) this concept has been published more times by others in the absence of any connection to the source than by myself, one would have expected the message would have sunk in. But it hasn’t. Probably because those who published it didn’t really appreciate, value and understand the concept in the first place.

[2] Not the original title ‘Lines of movement’, because this was about the only thing the plagiarist’s changed!

Ode to Alice

And a wake up call to the parents of all the Alice’s and Allan’s of the world

I just met Alice. And as a result of that meeting I felt inspired to immediately write on behalf of the ‘Alice’s’ of the world.

Alice will never read this article. Our meeting was brief and coincidental. My hope is that others may read and benefit from Alice’s story.

I walked into a sports store to conduct a product exchange and was served at the front counter by a tall athletic looking young girl, in her late teens I would say.

During our product discussions, which at best we were at the same eye level, perhaps she was slightly taller, I asked:

IK: ‘So tell me, did you use your height to play sport?’

This is a question I ask all tall young people!

Alice: Yes, I played netball, water polo and triathlons. Until I was forced to quit.

IK: Oh, why did you stop playing them?

Alice: Due to my injuries. I was not able to play any more.

IK: What injuries did you suffer?

Alice: I had one shoulder reconstruction and one knee reconstruction and I need a shoulder reconstruction now on my other shoulder.

IK: Oh…..what ages were you when this occurred?

Alice: I was in Grade 9 [about 13-14 years of age) when I had my shoulder reconstruction and Grade 11 [about 15-16 yrs of age] when I had my knee reconstruction.

IK: Oh….Tell me – what level of sport did you play at that made such a sacrifice for?

Alice: District representative level only. My school did take sport very seriously, especially water polo.

IK: Oh….what school was that?

Alice: xxxxxx [School name withheld for the publication]

IK: Oh…yes, they do take their sport especially water polo seriously.

IK: One final question if I may Alice. During high school did you engage in any training that was off the court or out of the pool?

Alice: Yes, I did gym. [strength training]

IK: Mmm…..that’s interesting.

Alice: Now gym is all that I can do.

Prior to the post 2000 period, I could count on one hand the number of elite female athletes I have worked on who had undergone shoulder or knee reconstruction.

My first shoulder reconstruction rehabilitation case with an elite female was with a 1984 Olympian. Prior to 2000 I cannot recall meeting a single elite (and I mean Olympian or similar) female who had shoulder and knee surgeries. And I am talking about elite athletes, with a decade or more of high level training.

Now the list of high school girls having one or both or similarly significant surgery is extensive. It’s the new norm. But why? Does it need to be?

There is a perception that surgery is ‘free’ i.e. there will be no consequences. This is not accurate. Take knee reconstructions. 100% of all reconstruction cases will suffer premature arthritis and 50% will have further knee surgery. Their lives will never be the same.

These injuries are unnecessary and avoidable. If anyone, parents included, cared enough to understand why in a few short decades, the world has changed so much.

Last week I went into another retail outlet and was served by a young male, about the same age as Alice, who I had coached in a a one-off field session in rugby. Let’s call him ‘Alan’. [Yes, Alice was her real name, but that doesn’t matter because Alice will never read this article, few if any teenagers will read this article, and those few parents that do will find a way to dismiss my perspective and go on their merry way endorsing the values and habits that are degrading their children’s lives forever.)

I engaged in conversation with ‘Alan’ about his rugby.

IK: ‘Are you still playing rugby?’

Alan: ‘No. I got hit in a game in my first season out of school and tore my biceps femoris [lateral hamstring] off the bone.’

He turned sideways and showed me his right lateral hamstring, bunched at about halfway up his thigh, with the obvious missing muscle leaving a visual gap at the upper end of his thigh where it would have otherwise attached to the hip.

IK: Wow! [shocked and saddened]

Alan: Yeah, it’s because of the way the game’s played, the way we are expected to take a wide stance and bend over and pilfer the ball.

IK: Really? I’m not sure its so simple. I believe there may be more to it and it didn’t need to have happened. As a matter of interest, what school did you go to?

Alan: xxxxxx [School name withheld for the publication].

IK: Say no more! (I didn’t need to ask my usual next question of ‘Tell me, during high school did you engage in any training that was off the court or out of the pool? Because I knew the answer….]

Alan: [Not buying into my inference that the injury was within his control and he was responsible for it] Yeah, but player [name withheld for the publication] did the same injury? [As if this made it okay, which I guess in a way is exactly what many now believe – it’s normal.]

IK: [Knowing the player involved from watching his career from a distance….] And what school did that player go to?

Alan: Oh….yeah…. [lost his argument there!]

I was in sport for over twenty years professionally before I heard of a rugby player pulling his hamstring off the bone. It took nearly another decade before a similar case, to which I was moved to joke about.

Now it is so common it doesn’t even raise eyebrows.

I could tell you exactly what is going on, and where it is going pear-shaped. But that information is mute and redundant unless you, as a parent, are willing to be different. This level of injury appears to be accepted as the new ‘normal’. So I would be wasting my energy giving the keys to injury prevention to a cohort of parents who believe what is happening and will happen to their children is normal, acceptable, inevitable, and unavoidable.

However in summary let me dismiss the claims the ‘game’ has changed. Yes, there may be some minor rule changes. Yes, more players look like they took the wrong door when they were really heading for the local bodybuilding competition.

However the game has not changed to such an extent to explain or justify the shift in injuries. Injuries that were rare at the elite level thirty years ago, are now common place at the teenage level. This is not right. And anyone who believes it is I assume also supports child abuse. Not meaning to make politically correct inaccurate assupmtions – rather what I am saying is what is being done to the young athlete –whilst still legally a minor – is akin to child abuse.

The fact that the incidence and severity of injures are currently perceived as normal and acceptable is not good enough. The reality is only a parent would care enough to advocate for the child, and then only the parent willing to swim against the tide.

I understand what is going on first hand. My children are being denied selection in the top teams at high school if they do not submit to participating in the ‘strength and conditioning’ programs. Which now constitute approximately 50% of total training. It is a choice of conformity or be ostracized. I understand it.

I estimate that 20% of the upper high school students playing in the ‘A’ teams will have surgery in the next 12 months, 40% of them will not be able to play sport past the age of 20 due to injuries, 60% will not be able to play sport past the age of 24 years, and 80% of them will suffer injuries that will significantly and negatively impact their quality of life in their so-called ‘golden years’ or earlier. Just estimates….And yes, you, as a parent, are throwing the dice for them in this lottery called ‘talent identified youth sport’.

My question to you, parent is this – what price are you willing to pay (and I mean what price are you willing to have your child pay) in your child’s future quality of life, on their behalf, to be seen to be conforming, for something that is clearly and eventually not right, not in the best long-term interests of your child?

The case studies I have shared are not fictitious, nor are they rare. They are the new norm. You just need to decide if you want them to be your child’s new norm?

—-

Footnote. If and when Alice realises that the pain she will experience for the rest of her life from the injuries and surgeries obtained in the name of ‘sport’ and ‘strength and conditioning’ could have been prevented, I hope she can find it in herself to forgive her parents, teachers, sports coaches, and the so-called ‘strength and conditioning coaches’ that were responsible. I could say forgive them for they knew what what they were doing, however I believe it more accurate to say ‘forgive them for they didn’t bother to dig deep enough to obtain the information that was available but not mainstream, that could have prevented the conditions that the ‘Alice’s’ and ‘Alan’s’ of the world will suffer.

There is a better way – Part 1: Why are you ignoring the message from Tom Brady, Kevin Durant, and Novak Djokovic?

More athletes are having their athleticism destroyed, their careers shortened, and their long term quality of life threatened because of they way they are being trained than ever before in my lifetime.  The athlete training world has lost the plot.  Not concerned or don’t buy into this statement?  Then you don’t read any further.  There’s heaps of more valuable articles on the internet for you to read, such as how to create hypertrophy in the absence of skills, or the exact liquid temperature to consume your glutamine in the absence of any focus on foundational nutrition…For those that resonate with my concerns, I invite you to stay with me.

Is that my opinion or is it a scientific fact? It’s my opinion. Now those who don’t know or don’t appreciate (or don’t want to do either for various reasons) the depth of experience training athletes or track record in identifying limiting factors in sports training and performance and innovating solutions that have led to this opinion – you may be forgiven for discarding my opinion.

However before you disregard my conclusions on the state of athletic preparation, I want you know you are also disregarding the opinion of a couple of athletes that have also to train differently to what most are doing – Tom Brady, Kevin Durant and Novak Djokovic.

The way we train athletes does more harm than good. That’s the message I have been sharing since the 1990s. And it is not just getting worse. It is reaching diabolical standards.

In fact I believe that most injuries are actually caused by the way athletes train.  The only injury acceptable is an unavoidable impact injury.   Virtually all soft tissue injuries are avoidable.  But imagine that – training, during which focus is geared towards performance enhancement, may induce most injuries.  Isn’t this ridiculous! [1]

In fact from my experiences and observation, the greatest effect that I have seen from most physical preparation is to detract from these five factors, not enhance it.  Imagine that – training and being worse off for it.  Well how do you think the athlete would feel if he/she found out!  Yeah, they’re real fit – to sit in the stands in their team uniform and watch![2]

…from my observations, most physical preparation programs do more harm than good. They may give short term results or confidence to the athlete, but result in significant performance restrictions and or injuries long term…. Quite simply, the majority of training programs are flawed from a physical preparation perspective and are causing the increased injuries[3]

For those not familiar with these three athletes who share my opinion, allow me to provide a quick bio. Tom Brady is the most successful quarter back in American Football history with five Super Bowl Championship rings.  Kevin Durant just won his first championship ring with the Golden State Warriors in the NBA.  And Novak Djokovic has been dominating men’s tennis internationally during the ten years, frequently occupying the coveted No 1 world ranking. He is considered one of the greatest tennis players of all time, with a 80+% match winning rate (the second highest in the Open Era).

So what does Tom Brady have to say?

“I have been blessed to learn the right methods, through my nutrition, hydration, pliability and proper rest. It’s really not that hard if you do the right thing.”[4]

No mention of maximal loading or hypertrophy training.  In fact he apparently stays away from lifting heavy weights, and focuses on flexibility.[5]

What does Kevin Durant have to say?

“All the strength coaches were laughing at me and s—. They were giggling with each other that I couldn’t lift 185 pounds and I was like, ‘All right, keep laughing. Keep laughing.’ It was a funny thing because I was the only one that couldn’t lift it and I was struggling to lift it. I was embarrassed at that point, but I’m like, ‘Give me a basketball, please. Give me a ball.’….I was ranked the last person in camp, drills-wise. I was the worst player, and the first player didn’t get drafted. That tells you a lot about the significance of that s—.”[6]

What does Novak Djokovic have to say?

           ….And I know if I need to spend two hours a day stretching, I’ll spend that time, because I know that’s going to make me feel good.”

The following statement comes from his first coach, Jelana Gencic, who guided him between about the ages of 6 years through to his early teens.

“You know Novak was not too strong a boy,” Gencic said. “You know how he is now elastic and flexible. Do you know why? It’s because I didn’t want to work too hard with him.”…Gencic held up her racket“This,” she said, “is the heaviest thing he had to handle. We only worked on his legs, his quickness, only fitness on the court, not in the weight room. We stretched and did special movements for tennis, to be flexible, to be agile and to be fast and with the legs. And now he’s excellent, excellent, excellent.”

Djokovic said Gencic’s approach was always long-term.

“Jelena was one of the people that had a huge impact and huge influence on that part of let’s say my profession, being flexible and taking care of my elasticity of the muscles,” he said Saturday. “Because she taught me and convinced me that if I stayed flexible, not only will I be able to move well around the court and be able to recover well after the matches, but also I’ll be able to have a long career……[7]

If you look at how the world is training athletes, its obvious that the majority are disregarding the messages from this dominant sporting icons.  Allow me acknowledge one of the most likely criticisms. That the opinions of these three athletes does not override the fact that thousands of other athletes have trained more trend like – heavy load, excessive volume, to high levels of fatigue.  I acknowledge this counter argument.  You are right. You can always provide evidence to support both the for and against of any argument.

However allow me to share what I believe is one indisputable fact – that the evidence provided in the case studies of these three athletes confirms that you can become the best in the world without the training proposed by most coaches and engaged in by most athletes. The way most train is not a common denominator with success.  It’s not necessary,  its not optimal, and I suggest in most cases does more damage than good.

I suggest that conforming to the dominant trends will is a common denominator with injuries, reduced athleticism, shortened careers and a lower quality of later life.

The great thing about human life is we get to choose what we believe in. If you as an athlete choose to embrace the mainstream approach, fantastic and good luck.  If you are a coach and also choose to believe in and embrace the current dominant training methods, I trust in the future you take time to reflect upon the outcomes, and be accountable.   Visit with your athletes 20-40 years after they have retired, and see how they are going. And take responsibility.

For those athletes and coaches who are concerned about the direction of training and want to believe there is a better way – congratulations. There is a better way.  I have spend the last four decades discovering better ways to train, and we teach  these better ways when we work with athletes or coaches.   For example, the KSI Coaching Program aims to provide you with the tools to train athletes and others in their highest and best interests, with no interest in what the dominant trend is or will be in the future.

The training world is now one where you will get a job whether you are great or incompetent – there is simply demand for services. However if you want to go beyond simply ‘getting a job’, if you want to do the best by the athlete, to fulfill your potential – you are not going to achieve these goals training the way everyone else is training.

What is happening is not good enough, and the athlete is paying the price. The good news is there is a better way. The question remains – will you go there?

Note:

In July 2017 we are offering selected physical preparation coaches the opportunity to spend 21 days with my top coaches and myself; through webinar and forum interaction.  It’s not for everyone. Here are some of our pre-qualifications criteria:

  1. You need to have been coaching for at least 5 years.
  2. You need to have come to the conclusion that there is a better way (for both you and your clients).
  3. You need to have taken some action to date to study KSI material (not including free online articles).

21 days with us during which you will get an inside look at who we are, what we do, and why we are totally confident we lead the world in athlete preparation.  Free.  Email info@kingsports.net immediately if you want to be part of this program and qualify.

[1] King, I., 1997, Winning &amp; Losing, Ch 5, p. 25

[2] King, I., 1999, So you want to become a physical preparation coach, p. 30-31

[3] King, I., 2005, The way of the physical preparation coach, p. 66-67

[4] http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2686534-in-better-shape-than-ever-at-age-39-heres-how-tom-brady-does-it

[5] http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tom-brady-says-hurting-time-162548454.html

[6] http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/kevin-durant-calls-nba-combine-waste-time-top/story?id=47338234

[7] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/03/sports/tennis/djokovic-bends-and-twists-but-doesnt-break.html

Hoping to catch up to the other schools in strength & conditioning  

At the end of a coaching session where I was giving back, along with a number of other of former elite athletes in a specific sport, the coordinator introduced me to a young man who he explained was a teacher at a private school who had been entrusted with the task of introducing ‘strength and conditioning’ to his school, with the specific intent of ‘catching up to the other schools in their association as far as strength and conditioning’.

I didn’t want to say anything to the young man, to spoil his eagerness, so I kept a straight face. But inside I cringed – ‘catch up to the other schools in strength and conditioning?’ Why would you want to do that? It should more accurately described as ‘catching down’.

Let me explain.

In the 1970s not many high schools had gyms and in the ones that did have, there was no formal programming and no ‘strength and conditioning’ service provision. Firstly because there was no such thing as a ‘strength and conditioning coach’, as the term ‘strength and conditioning’ was an afterthought by a professional organization with a strength focus that belated wanted to expand their focus without changing their acronym (you can read more about that in my original writings on this subject in ‘So You Want to Become…’). And secondly because organized physical preparation (as I prefer to call it) was not even provided to the majority of western world elite adult teams at that time.

In the early 1980s in Australia the majority of 18 year and older elite athlete that I worked with (and there were thousands) were what I called clean skins. They had never done formal physical preparation. I only had to undo the imbalances that their sport had created in their body. I summarized at that time it usually took three years of solid supervised and individualized training to clean them p to the level of being injury free for the most part for the rest of their career.

Fast forward to the second decade of the 21st century and what’s changed? I inherit broken athletes from the age of 12 upwards. ACL reconstruction, stress fractures of the lower back, shoulder and hip surgery – you name it. So what’s changed?

Many in the respective sports would tell you it’s just the sport – it’s inevitable. I don’t agree, and my experience doesn’t support this. Some will say the athletes are bigger and stronger and the impacts are greater. Really? Aside from non-specific strength tests, my experiences and observations don’t support this. A more recent trendy explanation is that the athletes specialize too early. Sounds good, and it may be a contributor, but for me this also fails to explain the difference. So what is my conclusion?

In the 1970s and 1980s athletes gaining exposure to formal physical preparation as they entered elite ranks around 20 years of age typically retired at about 30 years or age. So that’s about 10 years. What if that retirement was forced more by physical preparation inducted injury than age or their sport? Now holding that thought for a moment, what if take those same flawed training concepts and applied them to a 20 year old? They would be out of the sport by about 20 years of age!

And that’s my theory. In fact I go as far as to say if a young athlete is talent identified around 8-12 yeas of age, and has the (mis)fortune of being exposed to ‘elite strength and conditioning’ – they will be injured by 16 years of age, undergone significant sports-injury related surgery by 18 years of age, and unable to play their sport by about 20 years of age as a general rule.

So in summary when I see the same flawed training methods applied to adults being applied to young athletes, I fear for their future.

So what makes me conclude that most training is flawed? During my last four decades of seeking answers and excellence in how to train, I have reached certain conclusions and theories on what it takes to create or avoid an injury.

Are my conclusions the same as the masses? No. Should this be a concern? Only if you are a conformist. If your dominant need is to be liked, and to achieve this you need to be like others, then you would be concerned by the fact that I have reached certain theories that differ from the mainstream. On the other hand if you realize that to get a different and ideally better result than the masses, you need to train differently – then you would be excited.

In my opinion the only improvements we have seen in training is in the ability to measure it, the technology of equipment, and the technology of the surgery to repaid the injuries.

Could it be possible that what the majority – and that probably means you – are doing more damage to good in their training? That is my suggestion. Is it popular? No. Is it easy to discredit? Yes. Does this what ever else is doing approach to training result in the best possible sporting out comes? No.

So if I am on track, why do most continue on this path? The answers lies there. Because most do it. And the majority are so insecure about their actions they seek comfort in the masses. Will the get away with it? Legally yes, because the interpretation will be that is what is accepted practice. Should they be able to sleep at night? I suggest not, if they have a conscience.

Why I am I so firm about this? I speak for the athlete. My heart goes out to the legally minor young athlete who has an adult guide them to life-long, career threatening, quality of life threatening injuries. There is a better way – I teach it openly and have done for decades. I believe that perhaps in the next generation, after my time on this earth, what I teach will be accepted as the final stage of truth as described by 19th century German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer – ‘accepted as being self-evident’.

But what about the one or two generations of young athletes who paid the price in their ‘strength and conditioning’ training between 1980 and whenever a better way is accepted?

So did I get excited for the young man empowered to bring his school ‘Strength and conditioning’ program up speed with other schools in their association? Not al all. I felt sad for the by-products of this intent. The young, innocent and trusting athletes. They are not, in my opinion, going to ‘catch up’. They are going to ‘do down’ in their athletic development.